The legal status of persons in the dwelling or other private property of which the search is carried out
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.102190Keywords:
, the right to inviolability of the dwelling or other private property of a person, appeal against actions of the investigator during the search, search, investigative action, protection of the the rights and legal interests of a personAbstract
The article is devoted to legal regulation of procedural rights and obligations of persons in a dwelling or other private property of which the search is carried out. Analyzed enforcement practice of Ukraine and the European court of human rights, foreign criminal procedure law, clarified the shortcomings of the normative regulation of the legal status of the individual, which can interfere with the right to inviolability of the home or other private property of a person. Suggestions to amend the current legislation with the provisions of the voluntary disclosure of the objects specified in the resolution, or the indication of the location of the person sought.
References
Petryshyn, O.V., Pogrebnyak, S.P., Smorodynskyi, V.S. et al. (2014). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Bunchyk, O.A., Kuibida, P.O., Khavronyuk, M.I. (2013). Naukovo-praktychnyj komentar do Kryminal’noho protsesual’noho kodeksu Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Faktor [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia Yevropeis’koho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «KUZ’MENKO proty Ukrainy» vid 9 bereznia 2017 r., zaiava № 49526/07. URL: http://instzak.rada.gov.ua/instzak/doccatalog/document;jsessionid=3A4333C82EEAEAFC36455B211E156EA2?id=92635.
Kerevuch, O.V. (2014). Taktychni ta protsesual’ni osoblyvosti provedennya obshuku zhytla chy inshoho volodinnya osoby [Tactical and procedural aspects of carrying out a search of the dwelling or other private property]. Aktual’ni problemy derzhavy i prava, issue 71, 379–385. URL: http://www.apdp.in.ua/v71/55.pdf [in Ukrainian].
HPU zaboronyla slidchym vidmovliaty advokatam u pravi buty prysutnimy pry obshukakh [PGO banned investigators deny lawyers the right to be present during the search]. URL: http://radako.com.ua/news/gpu-zaboronila-slidchim-vidmovlyati-advokatam-u-pravi-buti-prisutnimi-pri-obshukah [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI. (2017). URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17.
Ostrovska, M. (2016). Dopusk advokata do uchasti v provedenni obshuku [The admission of a lawyer to participate in the conduct of search]. Pravovyi tyzhden’-Legal week, issue 24–26, 7–13. URL: http://unba.org.ua/publications/991-dopusk-advokata-do-uchasti-v-provedenni-obshuku.html [in Ukrainian].
Farynnyk, V. (2015). Zahadka syn’oi papky [Mystery of blue folder]. Zakon i biznes – Law and business, issue 3 (1197). URL: http://zib.com.ua/ua/113888-scho_potribno_znati_gromadyanam_pro_poryadok_provedennya_obs.html [in Ukrainian].
Stykunov, A. (1996). Ugolovnye dela o lzhesvidetel’stve [Criminal cases of perjury]. Zakonnost’ – Legality, 1, 34–36 [in Russian].
Milova, I.E. (1998). Uchastie advokata-zashhitnika v sobiranii dokazatel’stv na predvaritel’nom sledstvii [Attorney’s participation in the collection of evidence during the preliminary investigation]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Samara [in Russian].
Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Respubliki Moldova vid 14.03.2003 r. №122-XV. (2003). URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30397729#pos=1;-263.
Arabyli, D.T. (2006). Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie osnovy regulirovanija processual’nogo polozhenija i dejatel’nosti advokata – novogo uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Sankt-Peterbyrg-Chelyabinsk: Poligraf-Master [in Russian].
Rishennia Konsultatyvnoi rady pry Heneralnii prokuraturi Ukrainy vid 17.09.2015 r. № 10-2015. URL: http://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/krg.html?_m=publications&_t=rec&id=163224.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Ірина Вегера-Іжевська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
