Choice of the subject of comparative historical and legal research: issues of methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.101529

Keywords:

method, subject of comparative historical and legal research, object of historical and legal comparison, type of comparison

Abstract

Methodical aspects of the choice of comparative historical and legal research subject are considered. Specific requirements, in particular ones for the choice of the country (countries) of origin of historical and legal objects; for the definition of the objects of comparative historical and legal analysis; for the choice of the type (types) of comparison besides the general requirements to the formulation of the subject of future scientific work related to the definition of its relevance, problematical character and а scientific novelty are analysed. Consecutive consideration of the key parameters influencing the choice of the topic of comparative research in the article is aimed at improving the methodical support of scientific activity in the field of historical and legal comparativistics

Author Biography

Денис Анатолійович Шигаль, Yaroslav Мudryi National Law University, Ukraine, Kharkiv

PhD in Law, Assistant professor, Assistant professor of the History of State and Law for Ukraine and foreign countries Department

References

Barton, V.I. (1978). Sravnenie kak sredstvo poznanija. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU [in Russian].

Bykovskij, S.N. (1931). Metodika istoricheskogo issledovanija. Leningrad: GAIMK [in Russian].

Grushin, B.A. (1961). Ocherki logiki istoricheskogo issledovanija. Moscow: Vysshaja shkola [in Russian].

Damirli, M.A. (2003). Specifika istoriko-pravovogo poznanija i novyj oblik istoriko-pravovoj nauki. Aktual’ni problemy polityky, issue 16, 416–424 [in Russian].

Kovalevskij, M.M. (1880). Istoriko-sravnitel’nyj metod v jurisprudencii i prijomy izuchenija istorii prava. Moscow: Tip. O. B. Millera [in Russian].

Koval’chenko, I.D. (2003). Metody istoricheskogo issledovanija. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Korshunova, N.L. (2013). Aktual’nost’ temy issledovanija i procedura ee obosnovanija. Gumanitarnyj vektor – Humanitarian Vector, 1 (33), 7–12 [in Russian].

Luc’, L.A. (2006). Teorija porivnjal’no-pravovogo metodu. Metody ta zasoby porivnjal’no-pravovogo doslidzhennja. Derzhava i pravo. Juryd. i polit. nauky, issue 31, 489–496 [in Ukrainian].

Pronshtejn, A.P. (1971). Metodika istoricheskogo issledovanija. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rost. un-ta [in Russian].

Saidov, A.H. (2000). Sravnitel’noe pravovedenie (osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti). V.A. Tumanov (Ed). Moscow: Jurist [in Russian].

Sytar, I.M., Chornobay, O.L. (2009). Metodolohichni osnovy porivnyal’noho pravoznavstva. L’viv: L’vDUVS [in Ukrainian].

Syryh, V.M. (1980). Metod pravovoj nauki: (Osnovnye jelementy, struktura). Moscow: Jurid. lit. [in Russian].

Tihomirov, Ju.A. (1996). Kurs sravnitel’nogo pravovedenija. Moscow: Norma [in Russian].

Tkachenko, V.D., Pogrebnjak, S.P., Luk’janov, D.V. (2003). Porivnjal’ne pravoznavstvo. V.D. Tkachenko (Ed). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Ulashhik, V.S. (2014). Vybor temy nauchnyh issledovanij. Zdravoohranenie – Healthcare, 7, 43–49 [in Russian].

Cvajgert, K., Ketc, H. (2000). Vvedenie v sravnitel’noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. (Vols. 1–2); Vol. 1: Osnovy. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnoshenija [in Russian].

Downloads

Published

2017-06-13

How to Cite

Шигаль, Д. А. (2017). Choice of the subject of comparative historical and legal research: issues of methods. Problems of Legality, (137), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.101529

Issue

No. 137 (2017)

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Денис Анатолійович Шигаль

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.