Algorithm of Actions of the Prosecution After Detecting Undeclared Assets in the Course of Investigating the Receipt of Undue Advantage

Authors

  • Vasyl Hudz National Academy of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.351253

Keywords:

civil forfeiture, undeclared assets, illegal enrichment

Abstract

The detection of undeclared assets in the course of investigating the receipt of an unlawful benefit by public official poses challenges for pre-trial investigation authorities, and requires them to make certain procedural decisions. In order to outline this algorithm of appropriate actions, the article examines the legal mechanisms available to Ukrainian law enforcement agencies in such cases. It is important to stress that when investigating the receipt of unlawful benefits, it may be necessary to apply legal instruments that have been introduced into Ukrainian legislation only recently, and that might require substantial changes in the near future. The aim of this study is to examine the algorithm of actions that are applied when Ukrainian law enforcement agencies detect undeclared assets during the investigation of the receipt of unlawful benefits by an official. To achieve this objective, the study employed formal-legal, logical-legal, dialectical, descriptive, systematic and logical methods The results of the study show that in certain situations, pre-trial investigation authorities have different tactics at their disposal. These include providing evidence that an official has declared inaccurate information, gathering evidence for a lawsuit that aims at shoving that assets have not been acquired lawfully and that is geared at recovering them as state revenue, or proving illegal enrichment. It is the author’s conviction that the study also proves that current Ukrainian legislation contains provisions that allow for effectively countering violations of the law and responding appropriately to the ownership or use of undeclared property by public officials. The author is also of the opinion that further research should focus on finding ways to improve legislation through the prism of judicial and law enforcement practice that will be developed in the future. This will help to improve the legal instruments described, adapt Ukrainian legislation to the legislation of advanced democracies, and contribute to the establishment of legality and the rule of law.

References

Maksak, V.I. (2024). Democracy in Ukraine: Challenges, values and development prospects. Public Administration and Management in Ukraine, 39, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.32782/pma2663-5240-2024.39.38.

United Nations Convention against Corruption. United Nations. (2003). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_c16#Text.

Rishko, B.S. (2016). Latent crime: Concepts, causes, detection methods. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 41(2), 130-132. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/75af4805-3623-4647-82a2-8de01deb4823/content.

Lazaryev, A.P. (2018). Mechanism of conducting investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings. Ph.D. Thesis. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.

Criminal Code of Ukraine. (April 5, 2001). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text.

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (April 13, 2012). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text.

Kolomоiets, T.O. (2021). Anti-corruption declaration as a means for preventing corruption in public service: type diversity consolidated in the world’s laws. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Law Series, 3, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.32838/tnu-2707-0581/2021.3/09.

Kolotylo, O.O. (2019). Confiscation outside criminal prosecution (civil confiscation): An international law perspective. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 3, 81-88. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Nzizvru_2019_3_10.

Skirmantas, B. (2025). Confiscation Beyond the All-Crime Approach and the Proportionality Principle—A Case of the Lithuanian Illicit Enrichment Offence Concept. Laws (MDPI), 14(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14010001.

Shabatura, M.V. (2022). Improving the current criminal procedural legislation on the association and allocation of materials of criminal proceedings. Nashe Pravo, 1, 241-246. https://doi.org/10.32782/np.2022.1.39.

Reznik, O., Shendryk, V., Zapototska, O., Popovich, Y., & Pochtovyi, M. (2019). The Features of E-Declaration as an Effective Tool to Prevent Corruption. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(2S). Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-features-of-edeclaration-as-an-effective-tool-to-prevent-corruption-8187.html.

Vargas, G.A., & Schlutz, D. (2016). Opening Public Officials’ Coffers: A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Financial Disclosure Regulation on National Corruption Levels. Eur J Crim Policy Res, 22, 439-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9320-3.

Chornous Yu., Denysenko S., Hrudnytskyi V., Turkot O., & Sikorskyi O. (2019). Legal regulation of crypto currency turnover in Ukraine and the EU. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(Special Issue 2), 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/legal-regulation-of-cryptocurrency-turnover-in-ukraine-and-the-eu-8439.html.

Khablo O., Nykonenko M., Zaika S., Galagan S., & But Y. (2025). Implementation of the principle of the rule of law in the criminal process of Ukraine under martial law. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 13(3), 479-494. URL: https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/citahukum/article/view/46340.

Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (February 5, 2024). Case No. 991/503/23. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116751816.

Decision of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (2022, July 13). Case No. 991/366/22. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105252483.

Khutor, T.M. (2021). Seizure of assets in favor of the state as a result of recognition as unjustified: A hidden type of punishment? Scientific Notes of NaUKMA. Legal Sciences, 7, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.7.61-70.

Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. (March 18, 2004). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text.

Khutor, T.M. (2020). Civil confiscation of unjustified assets through the prism of property rights protection. Retrieved from https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/469eb223-5ced-453c-a46b-33a937c44c6f/content.

Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862/05, European Court of Human Rights. (May 12, 2015). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154398.

Civil Code of Ukraine. (January 16, 2003). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.

Order of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (March 11, 2025). Case No. 991/1901/25. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/125747792.

How civil confiscation works in Ukraine (2024). Retrieved from https://ti-ukraine.org/research/yak-v-ukrayini-pratsyuye-tsyvilna-konfiskatsiya/.

Muhammad Azman Ng. N., Ayub, Z.A., & Rahman, R.A. (2022). The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich? UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11.

Order of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. (February 26, 2019). Case No. 1-r/2019. Retrieved from https://ccu.gov.ua/docs/2627.

Law of Ukraine No. 1700-VII "On Prevention of Corruption". (October 14, 2014). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18#Text.

Illegal enrichment (2025). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/share/p/15jWDRvELt/.

Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. (May 29, 2024). Case No. 991/3773/24. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/119385381.

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Hudz, V. (2026). Algorithm of Actions of the Prosecution After Detecting Undeclared Assets in the Course of Investigating the Receipt of Undue Advantage. Problems of Legality, (172), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.351253

Issue

Section

Articles