Methods of Encroachment on Cryptoproperty: Main Types and Qualification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.173.361496Keywords:
cryptoassets, cryptocurrency, criminal offenses against property, fraud, theft, blockchainAbstract
The rapid growth in the capitalisation of the cryptoasset market has led to an increase in the number of criminal encroachments on cryptoproperty. The technological complexity and digital nature of cryptoassets give rise to new methods of their unlawful acquisition, which creates a need for the scientific systematisation of such encroachments and the formation of unified approaches to their criminal-law qualification. The aim of the article is to classify the principal methods of stealing cryptoassets and, based on the analysis of the mechanism by which they are committed, to determine the specific features of the criminal-law qualification of such acts under the criminal legislation of Ukraine. The dialectical, formal-legal, system-structural, comparative-legal, and sociological methods have been employed. It is proposed to divide the methods of encroachment on cryptoproperty into two groups: traditional (violent seizures, fraudulent acquisitions, misappropriation, embezzlement, or seizure through the abuse of office) and non-traditional (the use of spyware, substitution of payment details, the use of counterfeit tokens, and exploitation of vulnerabilities in smart contracts). In cases involving the use of technical means of interference in the operation of information systems, the perpetrator's actions require additional qualification under the articles of Chapter XVI of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
References
CoinGecko. (2025). 2025 Q3 crypto industry report. Retrieved from https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/2025-q3-crypto-report
Dudorov, O. O., & Pysmenskyi, Ye. O. (Eds.). (2012). Criminal law (Special part): Textbook (Vol. 1). Luhansk: Elton-2. [in Ukrainian]
Antoniuk, N. O. (2012). Criminal-law protection of property: Study guide. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. [in Ukrainian]
Demidova, L. (2015). Incorporeal thing as the subject of a crime. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2(81), 101–108. [in Ukrainian]
Dorokhina, Yu. A. (2016). Crimes against property. Theoretical and legal research: Monograph. Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics. [in Ukrainian]
Kryshevych, O. V., & Roshchyna, I. O. (2022). Cryptocurrency as a subject of a criminal offense against property: National and international legislation. Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: Law, (23–24), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-3047-2022-12-23-24-168-175 [in Ukrainian]
Dumchykov, M. O. (2022). Peculiarities of qualification of fraud in cyberspace committed by means of virtual assets. Scientific-Informational Bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi. Series Law, 14(26), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.149-155 [in Ukrainian]
Kozii, V. (2023). Criminal liability for illegal possession of cryptocurrency in Ukraine. Social & Legal Studios, 6(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2023.33
Shchehlakov, I. E. (2025). Problems of differentiating crypto-terms in the qualification of criminal offenses against property. Bulletin of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 1(23), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2025.23.331560 [in Ukrainian]
Ordekian, M., Atondo-Siu, G., Hutchings, A., & Vasek, M. (2024). Investigating wrench attacks: Physical attacks targeting cryptocurrency users. In 6th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2024) (pp. 24:1–24:24). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2024.24
TRM Labs. (n.d.). The rise of wrench attacks and crypto-related violent crime. Retrieved from https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/the-rise-of-wrench-attacks-and-crypto-related-violent-crime
Verdict of the Obukhiv District Court of Kyiv Oblast of December 6, 2022 in case No. 761/31532/21. (2022). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107735753 [in Ukrainian]
Kyiv City Prosecutor's Office. (n.d.). Four pseudo-law enforcement officers detained in Kyiv for coercing a crypto-businessman to transfer 250 thousand US dollars under threats. Retrieved from https://kyiv.gp.gov.ua/ua/news.html?_m=publications&_c=view&_t=rec&id=368660 [in Ukrainian]
Verdict of the Obolonskyi District Court of the City of Kyiv of December 10, 2024 in case No. 756/12186/24. (2024). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/123696369 [in Ukrainian]
Verdict of the Saratskyi District Court of Odesa Oblast of October 23, 2024 in case No. 513/1179/24. (2024). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/122489352 [in Ukrainian]
Tiwari, M., Lupton, C., Bernot, A., & Halteh, Kh. (2024). The cryptocurrency conundrum: The emerging role of digital currencies in geopolitical conflicts. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(6), 1622–1634. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2023-0306
Watters, C. (2023). When criminals abuse the blockchain: Establishing personal jurisdiction in a decentralised environment. Laws, 12(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12020033
U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). BitConnect founder indicted in global $2.4 billion cryptocurrency scheme. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/bitconnect-founder-indicted-global-24-billion-cryptocurrency-scheme
Maras, M.-H., & Ives, E. R. (2024). Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining 'pig butchering' in the United States. Journal of Economic Criminology, 5(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100066
The Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. (n.d.). Pig butchering – how to spot and report the scam. Retrieved from https://dfpi.ca.gov/news/insights/pig-butchering-how-to-spot-and-report-the-scam/
Shchehlakov, I. (2025). Philosophical and legal problems of cryptocurrency decentralization. In Philosophy and Law: Abstracts of the International Scientific Conference of Postgraduate Students and Students (pp. 128–130). May 21, 2025, Kharkiv, Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]
United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York. (n.d.). Samuel Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/samuel-bankman-fried-sentenced-25-years-prison
Mackenzie, S. (2025). Crypto collapse: The cult of personality and the normalisation of fraud in FTX and Celsius. Journal of Financial Crime, 32(6), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2024-0054
Law of Ukraine No. 2074-IX "On Virtual Assets". (2022, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2074-20
Singh, A., Choudhary, P., Singh, A. K., & Tyagi, D. K. (2021). Keylogger detection and prevention. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2007(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2007/1/012005
Microsoft. (2025). StilachiRAT analysis: From system reconnaissance to cryptocurrency theft. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/03/17/stilachirat-analysis-from-system-reconnaissance-to-cryptocurrency-theft/
Binance. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.binance.com/en
Antoniuk, N. O. (2010). Legal nature of the legitimation sign. Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, (2), 278–285. [in Ukrainian]
Binance. (n.d.). Protect your crypto: Understanding the ongoing global malware attacks and what we are doing to stop them. Retrieved from https://www.binance.com/en/blog/security/7968393135385409266
Tsuchiya, T., Dong, J.-D., Soska, K., & Christin, N. (2025). Blockchain address poisoning. In Proceedings of the 34th USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 1243–1262). August 13–15, 2025, Seattle, WA, USA. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16681
Gao, B., Wang, H., Xia, P., Wu, S., Zhou, Y., Luo, X., & Tyson, G. (2020). Tracking counterfeit cryptocurrency end-to-end. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 4(3), 50:1–50:28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.02673
Maidanyk, R. (2024). Smart contract on crypto-assets in the civil law of Ukraine. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 1(127), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2024/1.127-7 [in Ukrainian]
Morrison, R., Mazey, N. C. H. L., & Wingreen, S. C. (2020). The DAO controversy: The case for a new species of corporate governance? Frontiers in Blockchain, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Іван Щеглаков

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









