The Concept, Essence, and Significance of Criminal Procedural Form

Authors

  • Anton Polianskyi Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Oleg Baulin Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise, Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Ihor Lushchyk Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise, Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.356468

Keywords:

form, content, criminal justice, criminal procedural form, criminal proceedings, procedural guarantees

Abstract

The relevance of the research topic is determined by the need for scientific research aimed at solving the problem of criminal procedural form, which cannot be solved without clarifying its content. The purpose of the article is to define the concept, essence, and significance of criminal procedural form on the basis of existing developments in legal science on the issue of criminal procedural form and analysis of the current state of regulatory and legal regulation of criminal procedural activity in Ukraine. Using a combination of general scientific and special legal research methods, as well as systemic and structural-functional approaches to defining the interaction of individual elements of the criminal justice system, the article analyzes the current legislation of Ukraine, the state of investigative and judicial activities, linguistic interpretation, and philosophical approaches to the perception and legal content of criminal procedural form. It is emphasized that the successful adaptation of individual provisions of Ukraine's criminal procedural legislation to the requirements of modern international standards largely depends on resolving the problem of understanding criminal procedural form. It has been established that criminal procedure reflects the content of criminal proceedings as defined by the legislator with regard to the order of criminal proceedings, which determines the structure of the proceedings, their organization, the order of each stage of the process, and procedural acts. The definition of criminal procedural form as the order of criminal proceedings established by criminal procedural legislation in general, the order of proceedings at each stage, as well as the order (procedure) for performing and formalizing individual procedural actions, adopting, formalizing, and enforcing procedural decisions is justified. The results of the study emphasize that the uniqueness of criminal procedure as a legal category is linked to its conceptual significance for the theory of criminal procedure law and the practical activities of criminal justice authorities, as it is a fundamental procedural guarantee of fair criminal proceedings and a universal means for the orderly formation and optimization of the criminal procedure system. Problems related to the improvement of both procedural norms and certain stages (phases) of criminal proceedings require priority research.

References

Mikheenko, M.M., Nor, V.T., & Shybiko, V.P. (1999). Criminal Procedure in Ukraine: Textbook. Kyiv: Lybid.

Hroshevoi, Yu.M., & Kaplina, O.V. (Еds.). (2010). Criminal Procedure. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Kovalenko, V.V., Udalova, L.D., & Pysmenny, D.P. (Еds.). (2013). Criminal Procedure. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.

Blaguta, R.I., Hutsulyak, Yu.V., & Dufenyuk, O.M. et al. (2017). Criminal Procedural Law of Ukraine. A.Ya. Khytry, R.M. Shekhavtsov (Еds.). Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.

Melnyk, S.M. (2001). Procedural Form in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine. Ph.D. Thesis. Kyiv.

Trofimenko, V.M. (2017). Theoretical and legal foundations of differentiation in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Ph.D. Thesis. Kyiv.

Dufenyuk, O.M. (2023). Conceptual model of balance in criminal proceedings: institutional, law enforcement, and personal levels. Doctoral Thesis. Lviv.

Islanikin, S.M. (2024). Criminalprocedural form: concept and significance in criminal procedure. Sociology of Law, 1-2(46-47), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.37687/2413-6433.2024-1-2.7.

Simonovich, D.V. (2014). Criminal procedure form. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series: Legal Sciences, 5-2(3), 233-235.

Tsyganyu, Yu.V., Kulebyakin, V.O. (2023). Differentiation of the criminal procedural form and its significance for criminal justice. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 2, 352-357. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.02.61.

Melnychuk, O.S. et al. (2012). Etymological Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. (Vols. 1-7), Vol. 6: U-Ya. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

Buryachok, A.A., & Hnatiuk, H.M. (Eds.). (1979). Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. (Vols. 1-11). Vol. 10: T-F. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

Busel, V.T. (Ed.). (2005). Great Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. Kyiv; Irpin: Perun.

Shcherba, S.P., & Zaglada, O.A. (2011). Philosophy. Kyiv: Kondor.

Kelman, M.S., Murashyn, O.G., & Khoma, N.M. (2009). General Theory of State and Law. Lviv: Novyi Svit-2000.

Kryvulia, O.M. (2010). Philosophy. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.

Sandiuk, L.O., Symonenko, S.P., Sulim, O.V., Shmygol, M.F., Shchubelka, N.V., & Yushkevich, Yu.S. (2017). Fundamentals of Philosophy. M.F. Shmygol (Ed.). Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.

Podolska, E.A. (2006). Philosophy. Kyiv: Inkos, Center for Educational Literature.

Radionova, L.O. (2025). Philosophy. Kharkiv: O.M. Beketov National University of Water and Environmental Engineering.

Blikhar, V.S., Tsymbaliuk, M.M., Haiworoniuk, N.V., Levkulich, V.V., Shandra, B.B., & Svyzho, V.Yu. (2021). Philosophy. (2nd ed.). Uzhhorod: UzhNU Publishing House "Hoverla".

Alyaev, G.E. (Ed.). (2012). Philosophy. Poltava: PoltNTU.

Nadolny, I.F. (1999). Philosophy. Kyiv: Vikar.

Danilyan, O.G., & Dzoban, O.P. (2018). Philosophy. (2nd ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo.

Khamar, U. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between the categories of content and form. Philosophy and Political Science in the Context of Contemporary Culture, 16(1), 170-176. URL: https://fip.dp.ua/index.php/FIP/article/view/860.

Shepitko, V.Yu. (2007). Criminalistic tactics (systemic-structural analysis). Kharkiv: Kharkiv Legal.

Tkachenko, A.O. (2003). The Art of Words (Introduction to Literary Studies). Kyiv: Kyiv University.

Dufenyuk, O.M. (2023). Balance of content and form in criminal proceedings. Analytical and comparative jurisprudence, 1, 506-512. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.88.

Kovalenko, E.G. (2004). Criminal Procedure of Ukraine. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine No. 4651-VI (April 13, 2012). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text.

Loboyko, L.M. (2014). Criminal Procedure. Kyiv: Istyna.

Pysmenny, D.P., Udalova, L.D., Pogoretsky, M.A., & Chernyavsky, S.S. (Eds.). (2022). Criminal Procedure. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.

Fomina, T.G. (Ed.). (2021). Criminal Procedure in Ukraine: Questions and Answers. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.

Alenin, Yu.P. (Ed.). (2009). Criminal Procedure Law of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Odysseus.

Dyakov, A.S., Kiyak, T.R., & Kudelko, Z.B. (2000). Fundamentals of Terminology: Semantic and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Kyiv: KM Academia.

Constitution of Ukraine. (June 28, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Rome, November 4, 1950): ratified by Law of Ukraine No. 475/97-VR. (July 17, 1997). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text.

Kharvoniuk, M.I. (2025). Crime in Ukraine in 2019–2024: level, structure, dynamics, forecasts. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 89(3), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.3.44.

Shumylo, M.E. (November 18, 2022). The Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine – 10 years: one step forward, two steps back? (Main provisions of the report). In Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: a decade of implementation and current issues: collection of articles based on materials from the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (рp. 38-52). Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.

European Court of Hunan Rights. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/.

Khotynska-Nor, O., & Legkykh, K. (2024). Resolving Conflicts of Law During Judicial Proceedings: An Empirical Study of Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.4-a000122.

Bobechko, N., & Fihurskyy, V. (2024). Prejudice as a Means of Proof in Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine: a Comparative Analysis With Continental and Common Law Systems. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(3), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.3-a000319.

Kaplina, O., Tumanyants, A., Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko, O., & Biletska, L. (2024). Dissenting Opinion: A Difficult Path to Finding the Truth (Based on the Example of Ukrainian Judges' Interpretation of Criminal Procedural Law. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(3), 223-255. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.3-a000325.

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Polianskyi, A., Baulin, O., & Lushchyk, I. (2026). The Concept, Essence, and Significance of Criminal Procedural Form. Problems of Legality, (172), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.356468

Issue

Section

Articles