Court Fees as a National Instrument for Access to Justice in Ukraine: a Procedural Barrier or a Forced Necessity

Authors

  • Serhii Kravtsov Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Oksana Uhrynovska Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.173.354780

Keywords:

court fees, exemption from court fees, access to justice, refund of court fees, instalment plans and deferrals of court fees

Abstract

This article explores the legal nature of ‘court fees’ as one of the indicators and procedural filters for access to justice.  Thus, in examining the main doctrinal approaches to the value of access to justice, the authors conclude that account must be taken not only of the legal framework but also of the social and economic development of the country in which an individual seeks to protect their violated, unrecognised or disputed rights. Furthermore, the authors conduct a detailed analysis of theoretical and legal approaches to the procedure for determining the ‘court fee formula’, and identify the main problematic issues and ways to address them. An analysis of European Union legislation regarding the differentiation of court fees suggests that it would be appropriate to introduce uniform standards regarding their amount. The research devotes considerable attention to institutional mechanisms for amending national legislation concerning court costs, in particular their differentiation by court level. As a result, the authors make proposals for improving the current legislation of Ukraine.

References

Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 231/2021 "On the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Judiciary for 2021-2023". (June 11, 2021). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/231/2021#Text.

Constitution of Ukraine. (June 28, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

Law of Ukraine No. 3674-VI "On Court Fees". (July 8, 2011). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3674-17#Text.

Karayanni, M.M. (2014). The extraterritorial application of access to justice rights: On the availability of Israeli courts to Palestinian plaintiffs. In H. M. Watt & D. P. Fernandez Arroyo (Eds.). Private international law and global governance (pp. 217-218). Oxford University Press.

Friedman, L.M. (2010). Access to justice: Some historical comments. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 37(1), 3-16. Retrieved from https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol37/iss1/4.

Barber, N.W. (2004). Must legalistic conceptions of the rule of law have a social dimension? Ratio Juris, 17(4), 474-488.

Rickman, N., & Tzavara, D. (2005). Optimal pricing of court services. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 31-41.

Fon, V., Parisi, F., & Depoorter, B. (2005). Litigation, judicial path-dependence, and legal change. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 43-56.

Maher, B.S. (2010). The civil judicial subsidy. Indiana Law Journal, 85, 1527-1556.

Christman, B., & Combe, M. (2020). Funding civil justice in Scotland: Full cost recovery, at what cost to justice? Edinburgh Law Review, 24(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2020.0599.

Resolution of the Supreme Court in case No. 120/3532/21-a. (February 9, 2023). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/108915325.

Law of Ukraine No. 2456-VI "Budget Code of Ukraine". (July 8, 2010). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17#Text.

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2016). European judicial systems: Efficiency and quality of justice (2014 data). CEPEJ Studies No. 2.

European Court of Human Rights. Perdigão v. Portugal (Application No. 24768/06). (November 16, 2010). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-101740.

European Court of Human Rights. Stoenescu v. Romania (Application No. 14166/19). (February 28, 2023). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-223272.

European Court of Human Rights. Jedamski and Jedamska v. Poland (Application No. 73547/01). (July 26, 2005). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69898.

Decision of the Second Senate on the constitutional complaint regarding the constitutionality of provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On Court Fees" in case No. 3-131/2023(242/23). (January 20, 2025). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-25#Text.

Supreme Court of Ukraine (Civil Cassation Court) in case No. 127/3026/23. (September 20, 2023). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/113654555.

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Kravtsov, S., & Uhrynovska, O. (2026). Court Fees as a National Instrument for Access to Justice in Ukraine: a Procedural Barrier or a Forced Necessity. Problems of Legality, (173), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.173.354780

Issue

Section

Articles