The Principle of Judicial Independence in the Scope of the Practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights: the Experience of Poland

Authors

  • Anastasiia Mits Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.352174

Keywords:

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the principle of the independence of the judiciary, judicial governance body, the right to a fair trial, effective judicial protection, rule of law backsliding

Abstract

This article examines the principle of judicial independence through the lens of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, using the judicial reforms in the Republic of Poland as a case study. The aim of the research is to identify and systematise the differences in the approaches adopted by the European courts in assessing violations of judicial independence, as well as to analyse the methods of legal interpretation applied in the relevant judgments. The study provides a detailed review of the texts of key judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights concerning judicial appointments, guarantees of judicial independence, institutional autonomy of judicial bodies, and the right to effective judicial protection. It demonstrates that the CJEU focuses primarily on the functional dimension of judicial independence in the context of the application of European Union law and compliance with the requirements of Article 19(1) TEU, whereas the ECtHR adopts a broader, systemic approach by assessing judicial independence as an integral element of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Particular attention is paid to differences in the standard of review, the depth of institutional analysis, and the role of the national constitutional context in the case law of both courts. The article argues that these divergences lead to different legal consequences for the Member State concerned and affect the effectiveness of the protection of judicial independence at the European level. It is concluded that a comparative analysis of the case law of the CJEU and the ECtHR not only allows for a deeper understanding of the nature of contemporary threats to judicial independence, but also reveals both the limits and the potential of European mechanisms for safeguarding the rule of law in the context of constitutional transformations within Member States.

References

Pech, L., & Shcheppele, K.L. (2017). Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3-47. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3009280.

Sadurski, W. (2018). Bad Response to a Tragic Choice: the Case of Polish Council of the Judiciary. Verfassungsblog. Retrieved from https://verfassungsblog.de/bad-response-to-a-tragic-choice-the-case-of-polish-council-of-the-judiciary/.

Piątek, W. (2025). Restoring the Rule of Law in Poland: Towards the Most Appropriate Way to Put an End to the Systemic Violation of Judicial Independence. European Constitutional Law Review. 50849/21, 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019625000070.

Ustawa z dnia 12 lipca 2017 r. o zmianie ustawy "Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych oraz niektórych innych ustaw". (July 12, 2017). Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20170001452.

Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the case C-619/18 European Commission v Republic of Poland. (June 24, 2019). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0619_RES.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case 25226/18 Pająk and Others v. Poland. (October 24, 2023). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22display%22:[2],%22languageisocode%22:[%22POL%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-236221%22]}.

Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the case C-896/19 Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru. (April 20, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.stradalex.eu/en/se_src_publ_jur_eur_c_just/document/cjeu2021_C_896_19_57.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Broda and Bojara v. Poland. (September 29, 2021). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-216120%22]}.

Order of the European Court of Justice in the case C‑791/19 European Commission v Republic of Poland. (April 8, 2020). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62019CO0791%2801%29.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). (July 13, 2018). Preliminary opinion No. 924/2018 on draft amendments to Law No. 303/2004 on the statute of judges and prosecutors, Law No. 304/2004 on judicial organization and Law No. 317/2004 on the Superior Council for Magistracy. Retrieved from https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-PI(2018)007-e.

Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the cases C-585/18 A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, C-624/18 CP v Sąd Najwyższy C-625/18 DO v Sąd Najwyższy. (November 19, 2019) Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=ecli:ECLI%3AEU%3AC%3A2019%3A982.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case No. 43447/19 Reczkowicz v. Poland (July 22, 2021). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-211127%22]}.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case No. 35599/20 Juszczyszyn v. Poland. (January 30, 2023). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-219563%22]}.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights No. 1469/20 Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v. Poland. (February 3, 2022). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-215388%22]}.

Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the case C-791/19 European Commission v Republic of Poland. (July 15, 2021). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62019CJ0791.

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case No. 43572/18 Grzęda v. Poland. (March 15, 2022). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-216400%22]}.

Joint opinion No. 1206/2024 of the Venice Commission and The Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law on European standards regulating the status of judges. (October 14, 2024). Retrieved from https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2024)029-e.

Slinko, T. (October 27, 2023). Access to justice as a prerequisite for the realization of the right to a fair trial. In O.V. Shcherbaniuk et al. (Eds.). Modern challenges and current issues of judicial reform in Ukraine: Proceedings of the VII International scientific and practical conference. Chernivtsi.

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Mits, A. (2026). The Principle of Judicial Independence in the Scope of the Practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights: the Experience of Poland. Problems of Legality, (172), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.352174

Issue

Section

Articles