The problem of developing a universal definition of private military and security activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.172.349527Keywords:
private military and security activities, international law, mercenarism, cybersecurity, legislation, peacekeeping operations, unification of legal definitions, national legislation, legal regulation, international controlAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive study of the problem of the lack of a unified and generally accepted definition of private military and security activities in the system of international and national law, which negatively affects the effectiveness of legal regulation in the field of security. It analyzes the evolution of scientific approaches to understanding private military and security activities, as well as the provisions of international legal acts, regional documents, and the legislation of individual states that regulate the activities of private military and security companies. The key common and distinctive characteristics of such companies are identified, in particular with regard to the nature of the services provided, the degree of use of armed force, the level of state control, and the legal status of personnel.
Particular attention is paid to the reasons for terminological uncertainty, among which the diversity of functional models of private military and security activities, the lack of a unified international legal approach, and the political sensitivity of the issue of delegating state functions in the use of force to private entities are highlighted. The article examines the problems of distinguishing between the concepts of «private military activity», «private security activity», «mercenary activity», and «military support services», which is of fundamental importance for determining the scope of rights and obligations of the relevant entities.
The article also analyzes the legal, security, and ethical challenges associated with the activities of private military and security companies, in particular the issue of responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law and human rights, mechanisms for holding the personnel of such companies accountable, as well as issues of transparency, accountability, and democratic civilian control. It justifies the need to develop a universal definition of private military and security activities as a conceptual basis for improving national legislation, harmonizing international legal standards, and creating an effective system of international control in the field of security privatization.
References
Martens, F.F. (1901). La paix et la guerre: la Conférence de Bruxelles, 1874, droits et devoirs des belligérants (leur application pendant la guerre d’Orient 1874-1878); la Conférence de La Haye, 1899 / par F. de Martens; traduit du russe par M. le comte N. de Sancé. Paris: A. Rousseau, XI.
Sarah, Lee (June 24, 2025). Private Military Accountability Guide. Retrieved from https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/private-military-accountability-guide?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Isenberg, D. (2009). Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq. Praeger Security International. ABC-CLIO. (рр. 14). https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433090460040803.
Shearer, D. (2013). Private Armies and Military Intervention. Routledge. First published February 1998 by Oxford University Press for The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Singer, P.W. (2003). Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kinsey, C. (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. London; New York: Routledge.
Spicer, T. (1999). An Unorthodox Soldier: Peace and War and the Sandline Affair. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.
Barlow, E. (2018). Executive Outcomes: Against All Odds. Johannesburg, South Africa: 30 Degrees South Publishers (Pty) Ltd.
Singer, P.W. (2001). Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry and its ramifications for international security. International Security, 26(3), 186-220. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3092094.
Singer, P.W. (2008). Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Updated ed. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
The impact of mercenary activities on the right of peoples to self-determination: fact sheet No. 28 / OHCHR. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (Mar. 2002). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-no-28-impact-mercenary-activities-right-peoples-self.
Avant, D.D. (2005). The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge (рр. 1-2).
Avtushenko, I.B., & Avtushenko, O.S. (2020). Private military companies as one of the tools for waging modern wars. Bulletin of the National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine, 2, 45-53. Retrieved from https://vnv.asv.gov.ua/article/view/306038.
Savka, O.I. (2025). Problems of participation of private military companies in modern international political processes. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 88(4), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.4.20.
The Montreux Document on Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies During Armed Conflict. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/ assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf.
G4S. Who we are / G4S Global. G4S Limited. London, United Kingdom, 2025. Retrieved from https://www.g4s.com/who-we-are.
Report of the Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination (A/HRC/15/25). (July 2, 2010). Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/english/issues/mercenaries/docs/A.HRC.15.25.pdf.
Article 2. Draft possible Convention on Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) for consideration and decision by the Human Rights Council // Report of the Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination (A/HRC/15/25). Geneva: United Nations, July 2010. P. 26. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/english/issues/mercenaries/docs/A.HRC.15.25.pdf.
Prystash, A. (2022). Private military companies as a factor influencing state security. Grail of Science, 17, 284-286. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.22.07.2022.051.
Avtushenko, I., & Avtushenko, O. (2024). Private military companies as a tool of waging modern wars. Military Science Bulletin, 41, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.33577/2313-5603.41.2024.120-132.
Ivasechko, O.Yа., & Bondar, D.A. (2023). International experience of the activities of private military companies in armed conflicts. Regional Studies, 32, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2023.32.16.
Gillard, E.-C. (2006). Business goes to war: private military/security companies and international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 88(863), 525-538. Retrieved from https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irrc_863_4.pdf.
Savka, O.I. (2025). Formation of a model for international legal regulation of private military and security activities. Scientific Bulletin of UzhNU. Series: Law, 89(4), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.4.31.
Gradetskyi, A., Gradetska, N., & Yarema, V. (2025). Private military and security companies as an international low issue in modern realities. Law and Public Administration, 1, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.32782/pdu.2025.1.1.
Hin-Yan Liu. Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare as Emerging Gaps in Private Military and Security Company Regulation: Thoughts for the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries. Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen. Retrieved from https:/www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Mercenaries/WG/Event2015/HinYanLiu.pdf.
Tonkin, H. (2011). State Control over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/08014/frontmatter/9781107008014_frontmatter.pdf.
Prince, E. (December 16, 2008). How Blackwater Serves America. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122937198739501123.
Petrov, A.I. (2020). Fundamentals of Legal Science: Terms, Concepts, Categories. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Cameron, L., & Chetail, V. (2013). Privatizing war: private military and security companies under public international law. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, XXXV.
United Nations Human Rights Council. (September 28, 2017). Mandate of the intergovernmental open-ended working group on the elaboration of an international regulatory framework for the regulation, monitoring and oversight of private military and security companies. Human Rights Council Resolution 36/11. A/HRC/RES/36/11. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/HRC/RES/36/11.
Private Military and Security Companies: Search for International Legal and National Laws. (2020). European Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.05.36.
Hirsch Ballin, E., Dijstelbloem, H., De Goede, P. Security in an Interconnected World: A Strategic Vision for Defence Policy (Research for Policy). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2020. 183 с. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/a90fb78a-7fe3-41a9-944e-3516e8da83c5/2020_Book_SecurityInAnInterconnectedWorl.pdf
Ponomarenko, O., & Kovalenko, I. (2021). The concept, system, and classification of types of security in the context of international law. SLS Journal: Scientific Journal of Social and Legal Studies, 4, 12-27. Retrieved from https://sls-journal.com.ua/uk/article/read/ponyattya-sistema-ta-klasifikatsiya-vidiv-bezpeki-v-konteksti-mizhnarodnogo-pravoporyadku.
Ivanenko, P. (2020). Financial security as a component of national security. Bulletin of Economic Security of Ukraine, 3, 45-56. Retrieved from https://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/698.
Moesgaard, Ch. Private military and security company: From mercenaries to intelligence providers. DIIS Working Paper 2013:09. Retrieved from https://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/69786/WP2013_09_Moesgaard_web_rettet.pdf.
Linti, T. (2016). UN’s Use of Private Military and Security Companies in Peacekeeping Operations – Is There a Legal Basis? Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 29, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.29.8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Олександр Савка
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
