The mistake of the causal relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.128.52094Keywords:
mistake of fact, causation, intent, mistake of the causal relationship, dolus generalisAbstract
The article deals with issues of the mistake of the causal relationship. The modern criminal law science approaches to the content of the mistake of the causal relationship and its significance to the qualification of the crime are described. It is proved that in cases of dolus generalis different mental attitude of the guilty person to two separate acts of his conduct exist. Consequently, in mentioned above cases mistake of the causal relationship does not have place. The rules of qualification of the crimes commited with the mistake of causation and in cases of dolus generalis are proposed .
References
Kirichenko, V. F. (1952). Znachenie oshibki po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Institut prava AN SSSR. Moscow: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, 96.
Jakushin, V. A. (1988). Oshibka i ee ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie. Kazan': Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo universiteta, 126.
Rarog, A. I. (2002). Kvalifikacija prestuplenij po sub'ektivnym priznakam. SPb.: Juridicheskii centr Press, 304 .
Aliev, Z. G. (2007). Oshibka kak osoboe obstojatel'stvo ocenki povedenija sub'ekta prestuplenija i ee ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie. Surgutskij gosudarstvenii universitet. Surgut, 213.
Pustoroslev, P. P. (1907). Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast'. Issue 1. Vvedenie. Istochniki ugolovnago prava. Prestuplenіe. Jur'ev: Tipografija K. Mattisena, 552.
Geller, І. Z. (1910). Oshibka cheloveka i eja znachenіe, pri vmenenіi dejanіja etogo lica emu v vinu. Jur'ev: Tipografija K. Mattisena, 146.
Mokrinskij, S. P. (1905). Nakazanie, ego celi i predpolozhenija. Part 3. Kauzal'nyj i potencial'nyj momenty dejstvija. Tomsk: Parovaja tipo-litografija P. I. Makushina, 293–553.
Matyshevs'kyj, P. S. (2001). Kryminal'ne pravo Ukrai'ny. Zagal'na chastyna: pidruchnik. Kyiv: A.S.K., 352.
Baulin, Ju. V., Borysov, V. I., Tjutjugin, V. I. et. al.; Stashys, V. V., Tac' V. Ja. (Eds.) (2010). Kryminal'ne pravo Ukrai'ny: Zagal'na chastyna: pidruchnik. 4th edition. Kharkiv: Pravo, 456.
Bezrukova, T. I. (2008). Fakticheskaja oshibka: voprosy klassifikacii i kvalifikacii. Ural'skaja gosudarstvenaya juridicheskaya akademiya. Ekaterinburg, 148.
Vapsva, Ju. A. (2000). Oshibka v soderzhanii sub#ektivnoj storony sostava prestuplenija. Universitet vnutrenih del. Kharkiv, 184.
Fatkullina, M. B. (2001). Juridicheskie i fakticheskie oshibki v ugolovnom prave (problemy kvalifikacii). Ministerstvo obrazovanija Rossijskoj Federacii. Ural'skaja gosudarstvenaya juridicheskaya akademiya. Ekaterinburg, 199.
Tagancev, N. S. (1878). Kurs russkago ugolovnago prava. Chast' obshhaja. Kniga 1-ja. Uchenіe o prestuplenіi. Issue 2. SanktPeterburg: Tipografіja M. M. Stasjulevicha, 333.
Kozachenko, I. Ja., Kurchenko, V. N., Zlochenko, Ja. M.; Aslanov, R. M., Bojcov, A. I. (Eds.) (2003). Problemy prichiny i prichinnoj svjazi v institutah Obshhej i Osobennoj chastej otechestvennogo ugolovnogo prava: voprosy teorii, operativno-sledstvennoj i sudebnoj praktiki. Assoc. juridicheskii centr. SPb.: Juridicheskii centr Press, 791.
Komarov, O. D. (2014). Znachennja faktychnoi' pomylky vynnogo pid chas pryznachennja pokarannja. Aktual'ni problemy derzhavy i prava, 72, 448−455.
Vyrok Nikopol's'kogo mis'krajonnogo sudu Dnipropetrovs'koi' oblasti vid 19 lystopada 2013 roku u spravi № 182/8352/13-k. Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/35352780
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 О. Д. Комаров
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
