The principle of legal certainty in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the quality problems of the criminal legislation of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.128.52082Keywords:
principle of legal certainty, the quality of the law on criminal responsibility, the accuracy of criminal law, the epistemological aspect, the logical aspect, the linguistic aspect, pragmatic aspect of precision of criminal law, the legislative machineryAbstract
The article provides an outline of the principle of «legal certainty» in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, shows its influence on the quality assurance of national criminal law and the principle of «rule of law» and «law» in judicial practice in criminal cases. It is noted that the category of «quality of the law on criminal responsibility» is closely connected with the principle of «legal certainty», includes a wide range of issues, the most important of which is the problem of the accuracy of criminal law. The content of this multifaceted category in terms of its various aspects: epistemological, logical, linguistic, pragmatic and on this basis are considered essential features and properties of the accuracy of criminal law, a necessary condition for ensuring the quality of the law on criminal responsibility. At the same time found out some shortcomings of the current penal legislation, proposals are being made to eliminate them.
References
Anashkin, G. Z., Petruhin, I. L. (1968). Jeffektivnost' pravosudija i sudebnye oshibki. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 8, 59–67.
Brajnin, Ja. M. (1967). Ugolovnyj zakon i ego primenenie. Moscow.
Varlamova, N. (2002). Princip pravovoj opredelennosti v praktike Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. Konstitucionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevrop. obozrenie, 4, 94−109.
Voplenko, N. N. (1982). Prichiny oshibok v pravoprimenenii. Opyt konkretno-sociologicheskogo izuchenija. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 4, 103–108.
Evropejskij Sud po pravam cheloveka. Izbrannye reshenija (2000). Moscow, 1.
Kovalev, M. I. (1973). Optimal'noe sootnoshenie formal'nogo i ocenochnogo v ugolovnom zakone. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 11, 68–74.
Kudrjavcev, V. N. (1972). Obshhaja teorija kvalifikacii prestuplenij. Moscow.
Kuznecova, N. F. (1973). Jeffektivnost' ugolovno-pravovyh norm i jazyk zakona. Socialisticheskaja zakonnost', 9, 29–33.
Lazarev, V. F. (1968). Problema tochnosti estestvennonauchnogo znanija. Voprosy filosofii, 9.
Materialisticheskaja dialektika kak obshhaja teorija razvitija. Dialektika razvitija nauchnogo znanija (1982). Moscow.
Naumov, A. V., Novichenko, A. S. (1978). Zakony logiki pri kvalifikacii prestupleni. Moscow.
Panov, N. I. Kachestvo zakona ob ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti i problema tochnosti pravovyh norm. Teoretichnі osnovi zabezpechennja jakostі krimіnal'nogo zakonodavstva ta pravozastosovchoi dіjal'nostі u sferі borot'bi іz zlochinnіstju (2009). Kharkiv: Pravo, 37–41.
Pigolkin, A. S. (1981). Zakonodatel'naja tehnika i pravotvorchestvo. Nauchnye osnovy sovetskogo pravotvorchestva. Moscow, 290–303.
Pogrebnjak, S. P. Osnovopolozhni pryncypy prava (zmistovna harakterystyka). Kharkiv: Pravo, 240.
Sagatovskij, V. N. (1974). Tochnost' kak gnoseologicheskoe ponjatie. Filosofskie nauki, 1.
Borysov, V. I., Zelenec'kiy, V. I. (Eds.) (2011). Teoretychni osnovy zabezpechennja jakosti kryminal'nogo zakonodavstva ta pravozastosovchoi' dijal'nosti u sferi borot'by iz zlochynnnistju v Ukrai'ni. Kharkiv: Pravo, 344.
Horol's'kyj, R. (2004). Zastosuvannja zakonu z nechitkym zmistom (dosvid SShA ta Jevropejs'kyh sudiv i mozhlyvist' jogo zastosuvannja v Ukrai'ni). Ukrainsiy pravoviy chasopys, 6 (II), 43−47.
Shevchuk, S. (2006). Sudovyj zahyst prav ljudyny. Praktyka Jevropejs'kogo sudu z prav ljudyny u konteksti zahidnoi' pravovoi' tradycii'. Kyiv: Referat, 848.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 М. І. Панов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
