Legislative flaws: characteristic features and separation from other legal phenomena

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.135.84792

Keywords:

legislative flaws, rule-making, legislative technology, legal collision, legislation gap, legislative error

Abstract

The article is devoted to defining characteristic features of legislative flaws from the point of view of the needs of legal doctrine and law enforcement application, enabling to single out specified legal phenomenon among others. Legislative flaws are considered in the light of the rule-making features of regulation of criminal legal procedural relations. It is noted that the flaws of legislation are an official (albeit negative) result of law-making activity. It is emphasized that state power statement of a legislative flaw is an official formalized criterion of legislative error, but it cannot be considered its mandatory feature. It is proved that the only universal and mandatory signs of a legislative flaw, which make it possible to separate it from similar legal phenomena, are social harm of legislative flaw, and as one of its principal manifestations, reduction of the effectiveness of law enforcement activity and level of protection of rights, freedoms and legal interests of participants of legal relationships. Taking into account the defined attributes, definition of legislative flaw is proposed as the official result of legislative activity (or inactivity), which in the process of its implementation leads to socially harmful effects and the fact of its existence reduces the efficiency of law enforcement activity and the level of protection of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of participants of legal relations.

Author Biography

Elena Leiba, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

postgraduate researcher of the Department of Criminal Procedure

References

Kovalenko, T.O. (2013). Yurydychni defekty pravovoho rehuliuvannia zemelnykh vidnosyn v Ukraini. Kyiv : VPTs «Kyivskyi universytet»; Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Navrotska, V.V. (2016). Vzaiemozviazky ta kolizii norm kryminalnoho ta kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksiv Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. 1, 243-256 [in Ukrainian].

Vlasenko, N.A. (1997). Jazyk prava. Irkutsk : Vost.-Sib. izd. Kompanija [in Russian] .

Zhil’cov, M.A. (2011). Defekty trudovogo prava i sposoby ih preodolenija: Doctor’s thesis. Ekaterinburg [in Russian].

Ukhvala apeliatsiinoho sudu Poltavskoi oblasti vid 27 serpnia 2014 r., sudova sprava № 551/818/14 Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/41131992# [in Ukrainian].

Lupandina, O.A. (2001). Informacionnaja izbytochnost’ v tekstah normativno-pravovyh aktov: Candidates thesis. Rostov-na-Donu [in Russian].

Baranov, V. M. (1989). Istinnost’ norm sovetskogo prava. Saratov: izd. Sarat. un-ta [in Russian].

Lisjutkin, A.B. (2001). Juridicheskoe znachenie kategorii «oshibka»: teoretiko-metodologicheskij aspekt. Saratov: izd. Sarat. gos. akad. рrava [in Russian].

Syryh, V.M. (2004). Logicheskoe osnovanie obshhej teorii prava: vols. 1-3. Vol. 2. Moscow: Justicinform [in Russian].

Voplenko, N.N. (2010). Ponjatie i priznaki pravotvorcheskoj oshibki. Vestnik VolGU. Serija 5: Jurisprudencija. №1, 14-22. Nauchnaja biblioteka KiberLeninka. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-i-priznaki-pravotvorcheskoy-oshibki [in Russian].

Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym zvernenniam hromadianyna Soldatova Hennadiia Ivanovycha shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhen statti 59 Konstytutsii Ukrainy, statti 44 Kryminalno-protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, statei 268, 271 Kodeksu Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia (sprava pro pravo vilnoho vyboru zakhysnyka) vid 6 lystopada 2000 roku. Sprava N 1-17/2000 № 13-rp/2000. zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http: // zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v013p710-00 [in Ukrainian].

Pro zastosuvannia zakonodavstva, yake zabezpechuie pravo na zakhyst u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi : Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 24 zhovtnia 2003 r. № 8. zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http: // zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0008700-03[in Ukrainian].

Moskal’kova, T.N. (2009). Baranova, V.M., Mackevicha, I.M. (Eds.). Zakonodatel’nye oshibki: ponjatie, vidy i puti protivodejstvija. Pravotvorcheskie oshibki: ponjatie, vidy, praktika i tehnika ustranenija v postsovetskih gosudarstvah: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference (29–30 maja 2008 g.). Moscow: Prospekt, 17–26 [in Russian].

Published

2016-12-15

How to Cite

Leiba, E. (2016). Legislative flaws: characteristic features and separation from other legal phenomena. Problems of Legality, (135), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.135.84792

Issue

Section

Criminal procedure and criminalistics