The general bases of formation of staff for the court device

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.77794

Keywords:

court, the court device, the head of the device of court, the organisation of work of court, maintenance of judicial activit,

Abstract

In article are analyzed problem questions of a professional training for devices of courts, their appointments to posts, the list of posts of the device of court. Investigated scientific views on concept of public service and specificity of her regulation of devices of courts, volumes of standard regulation of questions of formation of staff of the device of court. The attention is focused on inconsistency of the current legislation in the specified sphere. Attention is drawn to the need to bring the departmental regulatory acts in conformity to the latest changes in legislation. Formulated offers to the requirements, nominated candidates to an position the head of the device of court.

Author Biography

Поліна Юріївна Шпенова, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

applicant of Department of Organization of Judicial and Law-Enforcement Bodies

References

Nauchnaja organizacija truda v upravlenii proizvodstvennym kollektivom. (1991). [The scientific organization of labor in the management of the production team]. Moscow: Jekonomika [in Russian].

Aver'ianova, V.B. (Eds.). (2002). Vykonavcha vlada i administratyvne pravo. Kyiv. Vyd. dim «In-Yure» [in Ukrainian].

Rozenbaum, Ju.A. (1982). Formirovanie upravlencheskih kadrov. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Cvetkov, V.V. (Eds.). (1988). Rukovoditel’ v apparate gosudarstvennogo upravlenija (organizacionnogo-pravovye problemy). Kiev: Vishha shkola [in Russian].

Pro sudoustrij i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII [On the Judicial System and Status of Judges: the law of Ukraine of 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII]. (2016). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 56 [in Ukrainian].

Nazarov, I.V. (2014). Realizatsiia sudovoho administruvannia na prykladi Pol’schi [The implementation of judicial administration on the example of Poland]. Visnyk Vyschoi Kvalifikatsijnoi Komisii Suddiv Ukrainy – Journal of Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, 2, 9–13 [in Ukrainian].

Pro derzhavnu sluzhbu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 10.12.2015 r. № 889-VIII [On Public Service: the law of Ukraine of 10.12.2015 № 889-VIII]. (2016). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy– Official Gazette of Ukraine, 3 [in Ukrainian].

Serdiuk, V.V. (2011). Aktual’ni pytannia diial’nosti aparativ vyschykh spetsializovanykh sudiv u konteksti sudovoi reformy [Recent issues of the devices of high specialized courts in the context of judicial reform]. Chasopys tsyvil’noho i kryminal’noho sudochynstva – Journal civil and criminal proceedings, 1, 27–37 [in Ukrainian].

Typove polozhennia pro aparat mistsevoho, apeliatsijnoho sudiv, zatv. Nakazom Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii Ukrainy vid 28.09.2012 № 115, iz zminamy vid 05.01. 2015 r. [The default position of the unit of local, appellate courts: the order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine from 28.09.2012 № 115 with changes from 05.01. 2015]. dsa.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://dsa.court.gov.ua/userfiles/file/DSA/2015/Nakaz01052015.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Dudchenko, O.Yu. (2015). Pravovyj status osib, iaki zajmaiut’ administratyvni posady v sudi [The legal status of persons holding administrative positions in the court]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Vymohy do osib, iaki pretenduiut’ na zajniattia posady kerivnyka aparatu apeliatsijnoho sudu (katehoriia «B»): zatverdzhenо nakazom Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii Ukrainy vid 15.08.2016 r. № 167. [The requirements for persons applying for positions of Chief of Staff of the Court of Appeal (category «B»): approved by the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine from 15.08.2016 № 167]. dsa.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://dsa.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Nakaz_167.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published

2016-09-29

How to Cite

Шпенова, П. Ю. (2016). The general bases of formation of staff for the court device. Problems of Legality, (134), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.77794

Issue

Section

Judiciary. Prosecution and advocacy