The forms of protection civil rights parties of the bank deposit contract
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.136.73740Keywords:
civil rights, the bank deposit contract, the forms of protection the civil rights and their effeciency, civil legislationAbstract
The article is dedicated to analyze the forms of protection civil rights parties of the bank deposit contract considering the statistical data in regard to banks which allow violations of these rights and necessity to restore these rights by competent bodies. Fixing in civil legislation a number of opportunities to protect these rights with the existing economic crisis, especially in banking field, have practical importance that based on the efficiency of any form. Therewith, research the peculiarities of protection violated civil rights of the bank deposit contract in judicial, administrative and other forms. Attention is drawn on the peculiarities of some forms of protection. So, emphasizing the certain duration of judicial protection, alternatives opportunities of protection and restoration the violated rights of parties of the bank deposit contract is analyzed by the author. However, due to lack of effective mechanisms for protection the rights of parties of mentioned contract, the author proposed some ways for improving protection the violated rights of parties of the bank deposit contract.
References
Vyvedennia bankiv z rynku. (2016). fg.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://www.fg.gov.ua/not-paying [in Ukrainian].
Potencial’nye poteri klientov neplatezhesposobnyh bankov sostavljajut 111 mlrd grn. Gontareva. bin.ua. Retrieved from: http://bin.ua/news/finance/finances/190394-nbu-rasschityvaet-na-prodazhu-aktivov-bankov.html [in Russian].
Koshty, scho vyplacheni vkladnykam neplatospromozhnykh bankiv, mln hrn. fg.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://www.fg.gov.ua/statystyka [in Ukrainian].
Pryluts’kyj, O.V. (2002). Schodo harantij dlia fizychnykh osib, iaki maiut’ vklady v komertsijnykh bankakh Ukrainy. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality. Issue 54, 142–146 [in Ukrainian].
Spizhov, V.V. (2009). Dohovir bankivs’koho vkladu (depozytu) za tsyvil’nym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. еxtended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Bida, M.A. (2011). Dohovir bankivs’koho vkladu (depozytu) za tsyvil’nym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. еxtended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Husarov, K.V. (2003). Systema orhaniv tsyvil’noi iurysdyktsii. Visnyk prokuratury – Рrosecution Bulletin. Issue 9, 85–88 [in Ukrainian].
Bilenskij, O.A. (2014). Zashhita grazhdanskih prav (interesov) v Ukraine organami ispolnitel’noj vlasti i pravo na spravedlivyj sud. Legea si viata. Issue 11, 21–25 [in Russian].
Harlamov, P. Ottolknut’sja ot dna: kogda prekratjatsja bankrotstva ukrainskih bankov. rbcua.com. Retrieved from: https://www.rbcua.com/rus/analytics/ottolknutsya-dna-prekratyatsya-bankrotstva-1466677046.html [in Russian].
Komarov, V.V., Bihun, V.A., Barankova, V.V. et al. (2011). Kurs tsyvil’noho protsesu. V. V. Komarov (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Gusarov, K.V. (2004). Diskussionnye voprosy jurisdikcii organov sudebnoj vlasti. Visnyk Luhans’koi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav MVS. Issue 2, 197–202 [in Russian].
Husarov, K.V. (2001). Perspektyvy rozvytku form zakhystu prava vlasnosti. Pravo vlasnosti: problemy zabezpechennia, realizatsii ta zakhystu : tezy dop. ta nauk. povidoml. nauk. seminaru molodykh vchenykh – Abstracts of Scientific Conference,(рр. 23–25) [in Ukrainian].
Komarov, V.V., Bihun, V.A., Barankova, V.V. (2002). Problemy nauki grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. V.V. Komarov (Ed.). Kharkov: Pravo [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Юрій Миколайович Моісеєнко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
