Scientific concepts and legal terminology and their role in criminal law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.149.202255Keywords:
criminal liability law, criminal law, concept of criminal law, categories of criminal law, definition of criminal law concepts, terminology of criminal lawAbstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of scientific concepts and legal terminology of criminal legislation, the identification of their relationship and role in lawmaking in the development and adoption of quality in form and perfect in content laws on criminal liability. The logical structure of criminal law concepts (content and volume) and their industry types are considered: specific, generic, evaluative concepts and categories as fundamental concepts of law; developed the basic rules for their determination and consolidation in the text of the law. The basic requirements (quality parameters) that are presented to legal terms are identified, with the help of which the law on criminal liability defines legal concepts that comprise the content of legal norms, legal structures and other legal formations that are components of this law. The proposals aimed at improving the form and content of criminal law are formulated.
The problems of scientific concepts and legal terminology considered in the article, their analysis and formulated proposals are aimed, as a whole, at improving legislative activity on the development and adoption of high-quality criminal-form laws in form and perfect in content. Legal concepts and legal terminology - organically interconnected phenomena of criminal law - are specifically logical and linguistic means of displaying and consolidating verbally in criminal liability laws (in their norms, legal structures, other regulatory legal conditions) subject to legal regulation formations) of phenomena (objects) of reality that are subject to criminal law regulation. The deeper the legal concepts are developed, the more perfect the legal terminology used in the text of the law, the better the positive law, which should be objectively capable of optimally regulating public relations in the field of criminal law.
References
Kovalov, M.I. (1980). O roli nauchnykh ponyatiy v ugolovnom prave i kriminalogii. Pravovedeniye, 5, 56–58 [in Russian].
Voyshvilo, E.K. (1989). Ponyatiye kak forma myshleniya: logiko-gnoseologicheskiy analiz. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU [in Russian].
Konverskiy, A.E. (2010). Logika traditsionnaya i sovremennaya. Moscow: Ideya-Press [in Russian].
Kondakov, N.I. (1976). Logicheskiy slovar-spravochnik. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Kirillov, V.I., Starchenko, A.A. (1999). Logika. Moscow: Yurist [in Russian].
Titov, V.D, Tsalin, S.D., Nevelska-Hordeieva, O.P. et al. (2005). Lohika. V.D. Titov (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Tsalin, S.D. (2006). Lohichnyi slovnyk-dovidnyk. Kharkiv: Fakt [in Ukrainian].
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. (1983). Moscow: Sov. Entsikl. [in Russian].
Vasilyev, A.M. (1976). Pravovyye kategorii. Metodologicheskiye aspekty razrabotki sistemy kategoriy teorii prava. Moscow: Yurid. lit. [in Russian].
Boyko, A.I. (2010). Yazyk ugolovnogo zakona i ego ponimaniye. Moscow: Yurlitinform [in Russian].
Gott, V.S., Semenyuk, E.P., Ursul, A.D. (1984). Kategorii sovremennoy nauki (stanovleniye i razvitiye). Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
Rozental, M.M. (1972). O kharaktere razvitiya filosofskikh kategoriy. Kommunist, 13, 103–115 [in Russian].
Babayev, V.P. (1978). Sovetskoye pravo kak logicheskaya sistema. Moscow: Akad. MVD SSSR [in Russian].
Shapchenko, S.D. (1988). Otsenochnyye priznaki v sostavakh konkretnykh prestupleniy. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kiyev [in Russian].
Kobzeva, E.V. (2009). Teoriya otsenochnykh priznakov v ugolovnom zakone. Moscow: Yurlitinform [in Russian].
Pitetskiy, V.V. (1979). Otsenochnyye ponyatiya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Sverdlovsk [in Russian].
Kosovych, V.M. (2006). Otsiniuvannia y otsinky u natsionalnomu ta mizhnarodnomu pravozakhysti. Lviv: Svit [in Ukrainian].
Panov, N.I. (2018). Otsenochnyye ponyatiya: metodologicheskiye aspekty issledovaniya i primeneniya v ugolovnom prave. Problemy metodolohii nauky kryminalnoho prava: vybr. nauk. pr. Anisimov, H.A., Haltsova, V.V. (Eds.). Kharkiv: Pravo, 248–262 [in Russian].
Kovalev, M.I. (1973). Optimalnoye sootnosheniye formalnogo i otsenochnogo v ugolovnom zakone. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo, 11, 68–74 [in Russian].
Frolov, E.A., Pitetskiy, V.V. (1976). Garantii zakonnosti i otsenochnyye ponyatiya v ugolovnom prave. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo, 6, 87–91 [in Russian].
Konverskyi, A.E. (2008). Lohika. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury (in Ukrainian).
Panov, M.I., Kharytonov, S.O. (2019). Suspilna nebezpechnist diiannia – fundamentalna oznaka poniattia «kryminalne pravoporushennia». Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy, 47-48, 16–17 [in Ukrainian].
Liubchenko, M.I. (2015). Yurydychna terminolohiia: poniattia, osoblyvosti, vydy. Kharkiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo Prava Liudyny» [in Ukrainian].
Pigolkin, A.S. (Ed.). (1990). Yazyk zakona. Moscow: Yurid. lit. [in Russian].
Kvitko, I.S. (1976). Termin v nauchnom dokumente. Lvov: Vysshaya shkola [in Russian].
Gubaєva, T.V. (2004). Yazyk i pravo. Moscow: Norma [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Микола Іванович Панов
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
