Legal regulation of digital three-dimensional works in copyright law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.148.182547Keywords:
copyright, three-dimensional model, plagiarism, unlawful borrowing, free useAbstract
The paper addresses to the problems of legal regulation of the digital three-dimensional model in copyright law. On the basis of judicial practice, theoretical materials and other sources the author’s definition of the term “three-dimensional model” and its main features are given. Direct attention to dualistic nature of three-dimensional model, which combines aesthetic and technical characteristics. These characteristics bring digital three-dimensional model closer to legal protection as computer programs and works of visual arts.
Due to the research legal nature of digital three-dimensional model, the gaps in regulation of public relations in the field of borrowing and creation three-dimensional works in copyright law are described. Also the main violation, which connected with digital three-dimensional model are revealed.
The paper contains analyses of Ukrainian legislation, which regulates issues of copyright on digital three-dimensional works. It also analyses legislation of The United States of America, The United Kingdom and the European Union in this field.
The research results in conclusion of necessity to distinguish three-dimensional model into separated copyright object, which helps its comprehensive protection. Also this paper has practical and theoretical significance for future research.
References
Yu, F., Lu, Z., Luo, H., Wang, P. (2011). Three-dimensional model analysis and processing. Berlin: Springer.
Bilodid, I.K. (1978). Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. (Vols. 1–11); Vol. 9: C. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Tymofeev, S.M. (2014). 3ds Max 2014. Saint-Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburh [in Russian].
Drobiazko, V.S., Drobiazko, R.V. (2004). Pravo intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Shtefan, O.O. (2006). Poniattia obiekta avtorskoho prava ta kryteriiv yoho okhoronozdatnosti. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 6, 3–8 [in Ukrainian].
Pro zastosuvannia sudamy norm zakonodavstva u spravakh pro zakhyst avtorskoho prava i sumizhnykh prav: postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 04.06.2010 r. № 5. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0005700-10.
Hlotov, S. (2006). Mozhlyvist zastosuvannia zakonodavstva pro avtorske pravo do tvoriv u tsyfrovii formi. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 3, 10–15 [in Ukrainian].
Pro avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava: Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.12.1993 r. № 3792-XII. URL:http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12.
Meshweks, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., 528 F. 3d 1258 (10th Cir. 2008). URL: https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/06/06-4222.pdf.
Matskevych, O. (2014). Avtorske pravo pry tsyfrovizatsii ta otsyfruvanni. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 14, 14–23 [in Ukrainian].
Nevzorov, Y. (2019). Pozhar v Notr-Dam: kakye vыzovы brosaet pravo yntellektualnoi sobstvennosty cheloveku, stremiashchemusia vosstanovyt utrachennuiu relykvyiu? URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/4/16/podnimutsya_i_snova_ruhnut_bashni [in Russian].
Guimberteau, B. (2019). Notre-Dame: enjeux juridiques autour de la reconstruction. Obadia S. URL: https://www.cahiers-techniques-batiment.fr/article/notre-dame-enjeux-juridiques-autour-de-la-reconstruction.40365.
Pro pravovu okhoronu baz danykh: Dyrektyva 96/9/IeS Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu ta Rady vid 11.03.1996. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/files/31338.
On copyright and related right in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC: Directive (EU) 2019/790 of 17.04.2019. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj.
Pro harmonizatsiiu pevnykh aspektiv avtorskoho prava ta sumizhnykh prav u informatsiinomu suspilstvi: Dyrektyva 2001/29/IeS Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu ta Rady vid 22.05.2001 r. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/files/31333.
Shtefan, A.S. (2010). Pokhidni tvory – skladni obiekty avtorskoho prava. Pytannia intelektualnoi vlasnosti: zbir. nauk. prats. Kyiv: Lazuryt-Polihraf, issue 7, 62–80 [in Ukrainian].
Semeniuk, K.O. (2019). Tryvymirna tsyfrova model yak spetsyfichnyi obiekt avtorskoho prava. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta yoho pravozastosuvannia: natsionalni, yevropeiski ta mizhnarodni vymiry: zb. tez dop. VII vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Kyiv, 27 veresnia 2019 r.). Kyiv, 285–290 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Катерина Семенюк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
