About the question of the correspondence of the self-preservation to the self-defense of the property rights in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115350Keywords:
self-defense, security means, signaling, striking, locking, security alarm and mixed-type meansAbstract
The issue of protection and its relationship with self-defense is relevant in the legal literature due to the absence of clear criteria for their differentiation and existence of sharp discussions of civilians.
Some civilists emphasize that the concepts of "defense" and "protection" do not coincide (O. M. Nechaeva, I. M. Osolinker). It is not accidental that there is no such term as "self-protection". In general, self-defense and self-protection may reflect definite stages of the mechanism of protection development as a reaction to the wrongful acts of the subjects of law. By installing security means and / or mechanisms, the subject thereby protects his/her rights and legitimate interests.
The author believes that the proposed criterion and approach in general is rational, since preventive mechanisms (devices, appliances, equipment, etc.) can independently carry out protective functions and inform about the violations of the rights of the subject (or threat to violation of his rights) after the prevention of such threat, or termination of the violation itself.
All means of protection can be divided into striking, locking, signaling and of mixed types. The responsibility of the owner of such means before the persons who have suffered from the corresponding damage will be decided depending on the presence of signs of unlawfulness in the actions of such persons. In the absence of unlawfulness, the damage is compensated by the owner of the protective means in a full amount, and in the presence of an offense, this issue is solved taking in account the limits of self-defense in determining the means of protection with the means of self-defense.
Thus, when security mechanisms (devices, appliances), reacting to a violation of law (the threat of its violation), prevent such a violation, they can be considered as a means of self-defenseReferences
Antoniuk, O. (2003). Zakhody samozakhystu tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hosp-vo i pravo, 6. 23–27 [in Ukrainian].
Antoniuk, O.I. (2004). Pravo uchasnykiv tsyvilnykh pravovidnosyn na samozakhyst. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Berestovskyi, I.V. (2012). Mekhanizm realizatsii funktsii zakhystu prav liudyny i hromadianyna Ukrainskoiu derzhavoiu. Mytna sprava, 1 (79). Part 2, Kn. 2, 254–260. [in Ukrainian].
Habriadze, M.R. (2014). Subiektnyi sklad zobov’iazan, shcho vynykaiut u zviazku zi stvorenniam zahrozy zhyttiu, zdoroviu, mainu fizychnoi osoby abo mainu yurydychnoi osoby. Mytna sprava, 1 (91). Ch. 2, Kn. 2. 131–35 [in Ukrainian].
Gribanov, V.P. (2001). Implementation and protection of the civil rights. [prod. the 2nd, stereotype.]. Moscow: Statute, Consultant Plus, 411 [in Russian].
Hrynko, S.D. (2008). Poniattia ta pidstavy vynyknennia zobov’iazan iz vidshkoduvannia shkody, zavdanoi pravomirnymy diiamy. Universytetski nauk. zapysky, 3 (27), 65–73 [in Ukrainian].
Ieshchuk, O.M. (2013). Zakonodavche rehuliuvannia administratyvno-pravovoi okhorony. Mytna sprava, № 4 (88), Part 2, Kn. 1, 248–253 [in Ukrainian].
Zhylinkova, I. (2005). Preventyvnyi sposib zakhystu prava vlasnosti. Visn. Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy, 3 (42), 130–136 [in Ukrainian].
Karkhalev, D.N. (2008). Preclusive measures of protection in civil law. Ros. Ustitsiya – Russian Ustition, 1, 14–15 [in Russian].
Komissarov, M.L. (2001). Vyznachennia ta klasyfikatsiia zapyraiuchykh prystroiv. Probl. pravozn. ta pravookh. Diialnosti, 2, 247–255 [in Ukrainian].
Kukhariev, O.Ie. (2010). Pidstavy vynyknennia zobov’iazan unaslidok stvorennia zahrozy zhyttiu, zdoroviu, mainu fizychnoi osoby abo mainu yurydychnoi osoby. Pravo i bezpeka, 2, 205–209 [in Ukrainian].
Luspenyk, D.D. (2004). Realizatsiia prava na samozakhyst tsyvilnykh prav – novela novoho tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: poniattia i mezhi zdiisnennia. Advokat, 11, 3–8 [in Ukrainian].
Matviichuk, V.O. (2005). Samozakhyst rechovykh prav. Derzhava i pravo, issue 28, 410–415 [in Ukrainian].
Mikshis, D.V. (1998). Self-defense of the civil rights: theory problems. Law: journal for business people, 1, 28–31 [in Russian].
Mikulina, M.M. (2012). Chy zabezpechenyi zakhyst sub’iektyvnykh tsyvilnykh prav osoby? Derzhava i pravo, issue 57, 306–311 [in Ukrainian].
Kuznietsova, N.S., Kot, O.O., Bodnar, T.V. et al. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. (2010). (Vols. 1–2; Vol. 2). O.V. Dzera, N.S. Kuznietsova, V.V. Luts (Eds.). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Nechayeva, A.M. (2008). Self-defense on family law. State and law, 7, 25–31 [in Russian].
Nykytchenko, N.V. (2011). Do pytannia poperedzhennia porushennia prav ta interesiv sub’iektiv hospodariuvannia. Derzhava i pravo, issue 53, 366–370 [in Ukrainian].
Osolinkier, I.M. (2011). Samozakhyst prava vlasnosti v Ukraini: Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Poroshchuk, T.S. (2002). Yurydychna pryroda samozakhystu v tsyvilnomu pravi. Probl. tsyv. prava ta tsyv. protsesu na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku zakonodavstva: mater. mizhvuz. kursantskoi (studentskoi) nauk. konf. (Donetsk, 5 kvitnia 2002 roku). Donetsk, 194–197 [in Ukrainian].
Pro deiaki pytannia zastosuvannia sudamy zakonodavstva pry vyrishenni sporiv pro vidshkoduvannia shkody, zavdanoi dzherelom pidvyshchenoi nebezpeky: Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 01 bereznia 2013 roku № 4. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ v0004740-13 [in Ukrainian].
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435-IV. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.
Yarotskyi, V.L. (2014). Samozakhyst yak pravovyi zasib zakhystu rechovykh prav [Self-defense as a legal means of enforcement]. Visn. Nats. un-tu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho». Ser.: Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo, 1 (16), 160–170 [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Людмила Іванівна Ляшевська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
