European Defence Community: origins of integration in the defence sphere

Authors

  • Іван Васильович Яковюк Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8070-1645
  • Роман Русланович Орловський Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115332

Keywords:

European defense community, European integration, military sphere, NATO, Western Union, Western European Union, European Political Community

Abstract

There is a tendency among non-historians to force «practioners» of the discipline to justify why the study of a particular episode of the past is so important and to articulate the lessons to be learned from the experience. The fate of international constitutions and treaties is particularly prone to demands of this kind. After all, «constitutional borrowing» has long been a common feature of international law and politics. This article will address one such Treaty from the past. But it does not aspire to preserving its historical integrity; rather to awaken interest in it in the first place.

         The European Defence Community (EDC) was an ambitious initiative in the first years of the 1950s. Leading European countries had different foreign policy agendas towards it. The EDC. could have been a crucial milestone on the long path towards European integration. European Defense Community (EDC), an abortive attempt by western European powers, with United States support, to counterbalance the overwhelming conventional military ascendancy of the Soviet Union in Europe by the formation of a supranational European army and, in the process, to subsume West German forces into a European force, avoiding the tendentious problem of West German rearmament.

One can trace the U.S. influence from the very first stages of the EDC. negotiations. Even in the agreement of the EDC., the footprints of U.S. policies can be observed, bringing the NATO Alliance to the forefront. The EDC. is also interrelated with the Marshall Plan, which leads us to think that the EDC. was not solely a European dream as has been widely argued, but rather an instrument of U.S. foreign policy, which could be resorted to as and when needed.

         Influenced by the Korean War, the French politician René Pleven evolved a plan that later was put forward by the French foreign minister Robert Schuman at a meeting of the Council of Europe in 1951. Though the weaker members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) were keen, the Scandinavians were cool toward the idea, and opinion in France and Italy was divided. A treaty was actually concluded in Paris in 1952, but tension between eastern and western Europe lessened, and by 1954 the necessity for the EDC seemed also to diminish. However, the failure to ratify its agreement by the French Parliament in 1954 left this project of defence integration stillborn but paved the way for another solution for the rearmament of Germany: the Western European Union (WEU), as a sub-group of  NATO.

Nevertheless, the dormant ideal, to contribute to a “European Army” later became one of the ultimate goals of the European Union.

Author Biographies

Іван Васильович Яковюк, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Doctor of Law, Full Professor of the Department of international law

Роман Русланович Орловський, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

Magister

References

Kojen, R., Mihalka, M. (2001). Bezopasnost' na baze sotrudnichestva: novye perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo porjadka. Garmish-Partenkirhen: Evrop. Centr po izucheniju vopr. bezopasnosti [in Russian].

Lekarenko, O.G. (2007). Problema perevooruzhenija Germanii i sozdanie Zapadno-Evropejskogo sojuza. Vestn. Tomsk. gos. un-ta, 303, 94–98 [in Russian].

Monne, Zh. (2000). Real'nost' i politika. Memuary; per. s fr. V. Bozhovicha. Moscow: Mosk. shkola polit. issled. [in Russian].

Hahalkina, E.V. (2016). Vybiraja mezhdu Evropejskoj armiej i NATO: iniciativy britanskoj diplomatii v sfere voenno-politicheskoj integracii v 1952-1954 gg. Vestn. Tomsk. gos. un-ta, 408, 162–167 [in Russian].

Holodnaja vojna. 1945-1963 gg. (2003). Istoricheskaja retrospektiva: sb. statej. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS [in Russian].

Yakoviuk, I.V. (2003). Istorychni peredumovy i osnovni etapy yevropeiskoi intehratsii. Visn. Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy, 4, 82–92 [in Ukrainian].

Iakoviuk, I.V. (2014). Pravovi osnovy yevropeiskoi intehratsii ta yii vplyv na derzhavno-pravovyi rozvytok Ukrainy. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Bariety, J. (1993). La décision de réarmer l'Allemagne, l'Echec de la Communauté Européenne de Défense et les Accords de Paris du 23 Octobre 1954 Vus du Coté Français. Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire, 71(2), 354-383.

British Defence policy since 1945. (1989). R. Ovendale (Ed.). Manchester, N.Y.

Byrd, R. (1989). The Senate, 1789-1989. Washington, D. C.: US Governmental Printing Office. Vol. 2. 682 p.

Cipher telegram from Brussels to Foreign Office, 11 Mar. 1948. Public Record Office, Foreign Office 371/73051.

Cipher telegram from the Hauge to Foreign office, 13 Mar. 1948. Public Record Office, Foreign Office 371, file 73052.

Cipher telegram from Foreign Office to Washington, 13 Jan. 1948. Public Record Office, Foreign Office 371, file 73045.

Conference of Ministers of foreign affairs, P., 1954. Documents agreed on by the Conference of Ministers held in Paris, October 20–23,1954, L., 1954.

Congressional Record. Proceedings and Debates of the 79th-82nd Congresses. Washington, D. C.: US Governmental Printing Office, 1948. Vol.94. Pt. 6. р. 7793-7794.

David Clay Large, Germans to the Front: West-German Rearmanent in the Adenauer Era (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1996).

Dockrill, S. (1991). Britain's Policy for West German Rearmament, 1950-1955. Cambridge, N. Y.

Documents on the History of European Integration, Vol. 1: Continental Plans for European Union 1939–1945 / edited by Walter Lipgens. New York: Walter De Gruyter & Co, 1985. 847 р.

Dwan, R. (2001). Jean Monnet and the European Defence Community, 1950–1954. Cold War History. Vol. 1, № 3, 141-160.

European Defense Community Treaty. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/5201/1/5201.pdf.

Fleischer B. A European Army? The European Defense Community and the Politics of Transnational Influence in Post-War Europe, 1950-1954: A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. Bremen, 09 June 2015. 521 р. URL: https://elib.suub.uni-bremen.de/edocs/00104929-1.pdf.

Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS). 1951. Vol. 3. Western Europe and the German Question. Pt. 1. Wash., 1981.

Hawes, M.G. (1977). The Marshall Plan for China: Economic Cooperation Administration, 1948–1949. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Jarkko Tuominen, The European Defence Community 1950-1954, The Second uneasy step towards the United States of Europe, http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kvtok/1997/3181.htm.

Journal Officiel de la République Française. (October 25th 1950), pp.7118-7119.

Kunz. J.L. (1953). Treaty Establishing the European Defense Community. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 47, #2, 275–281.

Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy / [edited by] George W. Breslauer and Philip E. Tetlock. - Boulder : Westview Press, 1991. P. xiv, 881 p.

Lippman, W. (1944). U. S. War Aims. Boston.

MacMillan, H. (1969). Tides of fortune. 1945–1955. L.

Maier, K.A. (1992). The Anglo-Saxon triangle, the French and the Western European Integration. NATO: the founding of the Atlantic Alliance and the integration of Europe. Edited by F. H. Heller and J. Gillingham. St. Martin's.

Mastny, V. (2010). The February 1948 Prague Coup and the Origins of NATO. Nye fronter i Den Kolde Krig / Mariager, Rasmus Mølgaard (Editor); Schmidt, Regin (Editor); Due-Nielsen, Carsten (Editor). Gyldendal. 368 p.

Program to Prevent Germany from starting a World War ІІІ. Morgenthau H. Germany is our Problem. N. Y.; L.: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1945. URL: https://aryanism.net/downloads/books/henry-morgenthau/germany-is-our-problem.pdf

Shaw, J. (2000). Law of the European Union. J. Shaw. N.Y.

Statement by René Pleven on the establishment of a European army (24 October 1950). URL: http://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1997/10/13/4a3f4499-daf1-44c1-b313-212b31cad878/publishable_en.pdf.

Svik, P. The Czechoslovak Factor in Western Alliance Building, 1945-1948. Journal of Cold War Studies 18:1 (Winter 2016): Р. 133-160.

The Brussels Treaty (March 17, 1948). URL: http://www.cvce.eu/en/education/unit-content/-/unit/803b2430-7d1c-4e7b-9101-47415702fc8e/d16547a7-de20-4a4f-9bfe-29dbfc79be69/ Resources#3467de5e- 9802-4b65-8076-778bc7d164d3_en&overlay.

The Foreign Policy of Churchill's Peacetime Administration 1951-1955/Ed. by J.W. Young. Leicester, 1988.

The organization of post-war defence in Europe (1948–1954). URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_organisation_of_post_war_defence_in_europe_1948_1954_full_text-en-c471a6f5-5975-460f-be2f-59476382ab41.html

Treaty Constituting the European Defense Community. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/5201/1/5201.pdf

Truman, H. (1956). Memoirs of Harry S. Truman. Bunray Suffolk: Hodder and Stoughton, Vol. 2. Years of Trial and Hope, 1946–1953. 594 p.

Türker, M. Arı. The European Defence Community in the U.S. Foreign Policy Context. URL: http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/6.-TurkerAri.pdf.

U.S. Senate Resolution 239 80th Congress, 2nd Session - ('The Vandenberg Resolution'). URL: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17054.htm.

Vandenberg A. H., Jr. The Private Papers of Senator Vandenberg. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Cambridge, 1952. 599 p.

Vandenberg Resolution. Senate Resolution 239, Eightieth Congress. A Decade of American Foreign Policy. Basic Documents 1941–1949. Washington, D. C.: United States Government Print Office, 1950. 1381 p.

William, L. Hitchcock, France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–1953 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).

Published

2017-12-08

How to Cite

Яковюк, І. В., & Орловський, Р. Р. (2017). European Defence Community: origins of integration in the defence sphere. Problems of Legality, (139), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115332

Issue

Section

International law