Using of sociological methods in the study of court work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115215

Keywords:

studying of court work, method of document analysis, method of observation, survey method, method of citizen reporting cards

Abstract

The article analyzes the possibilities of using the most widespread sociological methods in the process of studying various aspects of court activity. Are offered directions of application of different types of methods in research of work of court depending on their purpose.

Thus, it is noted that the use of the method of document analysis is effective in the investigation of the personality of the judge, in the analysis of statistics of various indicators of the court, the study of media materials. The method of observation is effectively used in the study of subjects of court sessions, the interests of participants, peculiarities of their behavior, studying the structure of the meeting, observance of norms for its conduct, etc. With the help of the sociological method of interviewing judges and employees of the court apparatus, one can find out the working conditions of judges and employees of the court apparatus, assess the business, professional and personal qualities of the leadership, study the moral and psychological climate in the team, etc.

Particular attention is paid to the method of citizen reporting cards, which is based on the traditional survey method. It indicates its essence and differences from the survey method. It is noted, in particular, on the following differences: the feature of the sample (the questionnaire is subject only to participants in court proceedings), the specifics of tools (a citizen reporting card based on certain criteria-measures), practical orientation (use of the results in the administration of a particular court and the judicial system as a whole).

It is concluded that the use of sociological research methods in combination with existing methods of judicial analysis will allow obtaining more complete information on the work of the court, diagnose existing problems, and promote the implementation of democratic principles of transparency and openness.

Author Biography

Ірина Валеріївна Підкуркова, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

candidate of Sociology Sciences, docent

References

Bryncev, V.D. (2010). Standarty pravovoyi derzhavy: vtilennya u nacional`nu model` organizacijnogo zabezpechennya sudovoyi systemy. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Moskvych, L.M. (2011). Efektyvnist` sudovoyi systemy: konceptual`nyj analiz. Kharkiv: FINN [in Ukrainian].

Ogaj, M.Yu. (2011). Rozrobka pidxodiv do pobudovy uzagal`nyuyuchyx pokaznykiv pry ocinyuvanni yakosti roboty sudu. Statystyka Ukrayiny, 1, 51–56 [in Ukrainian].

Serdyuk, O.V. (2011). Ocinyuvannya yakosti v administruvanni sudovoyi diyal`nosti: problema operacionalizaciyi. Visnyk Nacional`noyi yurydychnoyi akademiyi Ukrayiny imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo. Seriya: Sociologiya, 11, 299–306. redkol.: A. P. Get`man ta in. Kharkiv: Pravo. [in Ukrainian].

Georgicza, A.Z. (2012). Sociologiya prava Yevgena Erlixa. Na shlyaxu do integracijnogo pravorozuminnya. Naukovyj visnyk Chernivecz`kogo universytetu. Issue. 618. Pravoznavstvo, 7–14 [in Ukrainian].

Yadov, V.A. (2003). Strategiya sociologicheskogo issledovaniya. Opisanie, obyasnenie, ponimanie social`noj real`nosti. 6-e izd. Moscow: IKCz «Akademkniga»; «Dobrosvet» [in Russian].

Osoblyvosti vzayemodiyi sudiv ta zasobiv masovoyi informaciyi v regioni. (Analitychnyj zvit za rezul`tatamy monitoryngu v Krymu). (2007). Kharkiv: IPGD [in Ukrainian].

Paul, S. Sekhar, S. (2000). Benchmarking Urban Services. The Second Report Card onBangalore.Bangalore: Public Affair Centre.

Strategiya rozvytku sudovoyi systemy v Ukrayini na 2015–2020 roky: rishennya Rady suddiv Ukrayiny # 71 vid 11 grud. 2014 r. URL: http://document.ua/shodo-zatverdzhennja-strategiyi-rozvitku-sudovoyi-vladi-ukradoc215826.html [in Ukrainian].

Rishennya Rady suddiv Ukrayiny vid 2 kvit. 2015 r. URL: http://court.gov.ua/rsu/rishennya/risksjdfh [in Ukrainian].

Published

2017-12-08

How to Cite

Підкуркова, І. В. (2017). Using of sociological methods in the study of court work. Problems of Legality, (139), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.139.115215

Issue

Section

Criminal law and сriminology. Criminal procedure