Some of the determination of guilt as a mandatory feature of the subjective side of separatism

Authors

  • Дар’я Володимирівна Вітрова Department of Criminal Legal Disciplines of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-0706

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.102055

Keywords:

the subjective side of the crime, wine, direct intent, intellectual moment, strong-willed moment, separatism, bases of national security of Ukraine

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the subjective side of the crime. Existing positions in the science of criminal law concerning this element of the crime were studied. The article used the most accurate definitions in the study of this topic. In addition, a superficial analysis of the elements of the subjective side of the crime was carried out, but the author paid special attention to the study of the main category – fault. The whole section of the Criminal Code of Ukraine regulates the issue of determining the fault in law, in addition, the norms of international law determine the importance of this element of the subjective side of the crime. The wine in its turn has a rather complex structure, which is also fixed by the rules of criminal law. In the process of research, based on the scientific developments of scientists dealing with the issue of studying the problems of qualification of crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine, conclusions were drawn about the commission of acts solely with direct intent. Not the last place in the article is given to the question of intellectual and strong-willed moments that characterize guilt in the form of direct intent.

Author Biography

Дар’я Володимирівна Вітрова, Department of Criminal Legal Disciplines of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine, Kharkov

Graduate student

References

Naukovo-praktychnyy komentar do Kryminal’noho kodeksu Ukrayiny. (2002). Kyiv: A.S.K. [in Ukrainian].

Brajnin, Ja.M. (1963). Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ i ee osnovanija v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Moscow [in Russian].

Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Zahalna chastyna. (1997). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Petelin, B.Ja. Ustanovlenie sub#ektivnoj storony prestuplenija v processe rassledovanija: Teoreticheskie i taktiko-metodicheskie aspekty. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Bikeev, I. (2002). Aktual’nye problemy uchenija o sub#ektivnoj storone prestuplenija. Ugolovnoe pravo, 3, 9–14 [in Russian].

Zahal’noyi deklaratsiyi prav lyudyny vidpovidno do rezolyutsiyi 217 A (III) Heneral’noyi Asambleyi OON vid 10.12.1948 r. (1948). URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015.

Konventsii pro zakhyst prav ta osnovopolozhnykh svobod: konventsiia Rady Yevropy vid 4 lystopada 1950 r. (1998). Ofits. visn. Ukrainy. 13, art. 270.

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28 cherv. 1996 r. (1996). URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80.

Baulyn, Iu.V., Borysov, V.I., Tiutiuhin, V.I. (2010). Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Osoblyva chastyna. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Melnyk, M.I, Khavroniuk, M.I. (2010). Naukovo-prakt. komentar Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Kyiv: Yuryd. Dumka [in Ukrainian].

Harchenko, V.B., Perekrestov, B.F. (2002). Ugolovnoe pravo Ukrainy. Osobennaja chast’ v voprosah i otvetah. Kyiv: Atika [in Ukrainian].

Bantyshev, O.F., Shamara, O.V. (2010). Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za zlochyny proty osnov natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy (problemy kvalifikatsii) [in Ukrainian].

Zelenetskyi, V.S., Yemelianov, V.P. (2006). Kontseptualni osnovy vyznachennia katehorialno-poniatiinoho aparatu u sferi borotby z teroryzmom. Kharkiv: Krosroud [in Ukrainian].

Melnyk, M.I, Khavroniuk, M.I. (2009). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Kyiv: Yuryd. dumka [in Ukrainian].

Bazhanov, M.I., Baulin, Iu.V., Borysov, V.I. (2001). Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Zahalna chastyna. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Kryminal’ne pravo Ukrayiny. Zahal’na chastyna (1997). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Bantyshev, O.F., Shamara, O.V. (2014). Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za zlochyny proty osnov natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy (problemy kvalifikatsii). Lugansk: TOV «Virtualna realnist» [in Ukrainian].

Struchkov, N.A. (1963). Ustanovlenie sudom sub’ektivnoj storony prestuplenija. Sovetskaja justicija, 20, 11–13 [in Russian].

Tihonov, K.F. (1967). Sub’ektivnaja storona prestuplenija. Problema social’nogo soderzhanija viny v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Saratov [in Russian].

Dagel’, P.S. (1969). Problemy viny v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Voronezh [in Russian].

Published

2017-06-13

How to Cite

Вітрова, Д. В. (2017). Some of the determination of guilt as a mandatory feature of the subjective side of separatism. Problems of Legality, (137), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.137.102055

Issue

Section

Criminal law and сriminology. Criminal procedure